Category Archives: New World Order Conspiracy

Federal Judge States He Takes His Orders From England

FEDREAL JUDGE
STATES
IN COURT THAT
HE GETS HIS ORDERS
FROM ENGLAND
From STEPHEN KIMBOL AMES, Tel.

717-567-7675. 5/98: [quoting]

During the trial of James and Sharon Patterson,
(Case 6:97-CR-51) William Wayne Justice, Judge of the United States District
Court Texas-Eastern Division when presented with law stated: “I take my orders
from
England. This is not a law this court goes by.”

For all of those who did not believe that the United States was under Great
Britain here it is straight from the mouth of a Federal Judge. How much more
evidence ‘do you need?’ America has never been Free. The Revolutionary war was a
fraud perpetrated on the American people. The war’s purpose was to centralize
power and make the people easier to control. All Federal Judges, Congressmen,
U.S. Attorneys, State Judges, Legislators and most Attorneys know this and are
in fact British Agents. Their job is to keep the people in line and to be
productive slaves which they (The British Agents) are greatly compensated for.
The police do not know that they work for Great Britain they too have been
decieved so don’t attack them.

It is time for everyone in America to know the Truth. Let us
all work together in exposing the British Empire. Please re-fax and e-mail this
release to every Attorney, Judge, and Legislator in your area to let them know
they have been unmasked. Please get out your Yellow Pages and start faxing
everyone in your area and also read this release over every radio show possible.
We have printed thousands of evidence packages and mailed them across America
that prove that the United States is a British Colony. It is time to send the
British back to England. We must work together because if, we do not. we are all
doomed.

Your Friend.

Stephen Kinbol Ames Jr.

For More Information:
Stephen Kinbol Ames, c/o P.O. Box 5373. Harrisburg. Pennsylvania 17110

Phone: 717-567-7675;
Fax-717-567-2564

(And if one needs any further information, see August
22, 1997issue of Intelligence Review article “Britain’s ‘Invisible’ Empire
Unleashes The Dogs of War”) [End quoting]

Here is very good verification or what Hatonn has been telling
us all along – “from the horse’s mouth”

Advertisements

Great Britain a Hebrew Covenant

Great Britain a Hebrew Covenant

A little known fact outside of Archaeological circles is becoming ever more
known.

There is no Archaeological evidence that Hebrews lived as slaves in Egypt,
or that there was an exodus out of Egypt or that Moses led them out.

Not one shred of Archaeological evidence of millions of Jews wandering the
desert for forty years, surely there would be pottery or tools or some kind of
evidence left behind. Nor is there evidence of the Bibles main cast of Hebrew
characters.

Abraham, Joseph, Jacob, Moses, Solomon or David

There is however plenty of evidence of the
Egyptian Pharaoh’s who these biblical characters are based on.

The bibles Old Testament has carefully covered up
the connections between the Egyptian Pharaoh’s and Hebrew Patriarchs by mixing
up historical facts with myth and legends.

Modern Archaeologist have confirmed that the
Hebrews were not a race of people like once thought, they were a Semitic and
Asiatic class of foreign workers who migrated into Egypt from neighboring lands
in search of work as craftsman and builders, as their population grew over
hundreds of years they intermarried with the Egyptians and gradually rose to
positions of influence and wealth in Egypt.

Abram married his sister Sari; at Gods command angry
at the incestuous relationship he ordered them to change their names to Abraham
and Sarah. They then went to Egypt, where Abraham turned his Sister/Wife over
to the Pharaoh as a sex slave and was rewarded with gold and silver.

In 1818 Antonio Lebolo made a revolutionary
discovery that identified Abraham as an Egyptian Pharaoh during excavation in
the Valley of the Kings; he exhumed eleven Egyptian mummies along with rolls of
papyrus inscribed with hieroglyphic writings and drawings. One of the drawings
depicted Abraham sitting on the Pharaoh’s throne. Abrahams name was also
deciphered on a roll of papyrus. Joseph Smith published his controversial
findings in the “Book of Abraham” in 1842 and was murdered two years later. Today
the only Egyptian Tomb forbidden to the public is the tomb of Amenemhet 1 who
many researchers now believe is the biblical Abraham. The Pharaoh Amenemhet
worshiped Amen, the question then becomes is God and Amen the same. In the
Egyptian version, Amen also turned a river into blood.

There is ever increasing evidence that Pharaoh
Tutmoses 111 was actually Moses. Pharaoh Tsusennes was actually King David.

Why would the Hebrew authors of the Bible hide
the fact that the biblical characters were really Pharaohs? Bible and Egyptian
scholars concluded that the Jews had to hide their identity the same way Joseph
did and change their names if they were to retain power and rule Egypt. And
their lineage has continued to rule until this day.

Hebrew authors covered this up to hide the fact
that Hebrews and Egyptians shared the same royal bloodline. After the Egyptians
forced the Hebrew Hicksos out of Egypt the only way they could continue to rule
was to hide their identity from the Egyptian people and the Hebrews.

They continued to rule secretly and intermarried
with Egyptians and worshiped Gods and violated Jewish Hebrew law. They kept
their identities hidden in secret societies and royal power circles just as
they have done until this day.

The descendents of the Hebrew Pharaohs of Egypt
have ruled throughout history, through the millennia they have left oceans of
blood in their wake, they have murdered, cheated, slaughtered, robbed,
colonized and enslaved to fulfill their biblical covenants to maintain one
throne and one world empire.

Great Britain is a Hebrew covenant. Queen
Elizabeth 11 is a direct descendent from the long line of Hebrew Kings all the
way to King David, consequently all the way to Adam. This is according to the “College
of Heralds” in London.

The United Kingdom’s Coat of Arms depicts the
lion of the tribe of Judah in the pre- eminent right hand position, wearing the
crown, The Unicorn (Bull) of Ephraim of equal stature with the lion. The harp
of David recognizes the Davidic covenant and symbolizes the marriage of the two
lines of Judah in Ireland, through Jeremiah.

The Stone of Destiny is the stone that Jacob used as a pillow and had a
dream in which he saw a stairway to heaven. The Old Testament referred to this
stone as the “Rock”. The stone has rested in Westminster Abbey for 700 years
beneath the coronation chair before it was moved back to Edinburgh Scotland.
This is where the house of Israel relocated and it was the tribe of Ephraim who
were the caretakers of this anointed stone.

Queen Elizabeth is the 122nd lineal descendent of King David who
is of the tribe of Judah.

                                                Written By: Bo Ajala


Amen a Pagan Deity (Literally means “The Hidden One”) Hidden throughout the Bible

In the Bibles Old Test (amen)t,  Amen is hidden through out. The word literally means ” The Hidden One” 1 Kings verse 36 – Amen is described as “The Lord God of my God” Many are led to believe that it means “So be it” or “Truly”.

Q: “Is Amen’ the name of a pagan idol?  Should we
refrain from using this word in our prayers and in
worship?”

Answer:


 

Let us consider this word on the following levels:
–  Its pagan
connotations
–  Its use and meaning in Hebrew
–  Its use in Christianity
and Judaism
–  Should we use it or not?

 

Amen’ was one of
the main deities in Egyptian mythology, the worship of which  spread to Greece,
Syria and surroundings.

 

According to ‘The
Concise Columbia Encyclopedia’,  Columbia University Press.  Copyright © 1991 by
Columbia University Press:

Amon (â´men, ä´-)
or Ammon (à´men) or Amen (ä´mèn), ancient Egyptian deity. Originally the chief
god of Thebes, Amon grew increasingly important in Egypt, and eventually, as
Amon Ra, he was identified with RA as the supreme deity. He was also identified
with the Greek ZEUS (the Roman JUPITER).
(Ed.: Jupiter
or ‘Zues-Pater’ – ‘Zeus our father’).

The Official Internet Site of The Egyptian
Ministry of Tourism

has the following Web Pages with information about
Amen, the primeval idol:
Amen (Amon)
and Amen-Ra, King of the  Gods, and the Triad of Thebes

Amen worship
Amen of Thebes
Forms of Amen-Ra


Here are some excerpts from these informative
pages.
“Amen was the personification of the hidden and  unknown creative
power which was associated with the primeval abyss, gods in the creation of  the
world, and all that is in it. The word or root amen, certainly means “what is
hidden,” “what  is not seen,” “what cannot be seen,” and the like, and this fact
is proved by scores of examples  which may be collected from texts of all
periods. In hymns to Amen we often read that he is  “hidden to his children,
“and “hidden to gods and men” … Now, not only is the god himself said  to be
“hidden,” but his name also is “hidden,” and his form, or similitude, is said to
be  “unknown;” these statements show that “hidden,” when applied to Amen, the
great god, has  reference to something more than the “sun which has disappeared
below the horizon,” and that it indicates the god who cannot be seen with the
mortal eyes, and who is invisible, as well as inscrutable, to gods as well as
men.”

Amen, his wife, Mut,
and their son, Khonsu, represented the Theban Triad, the sacred family of
Thebes. Amen was the “King of the gods” during the period of the New Kingdom in
Egypt 1550-1070 B.C.E. when Thebes was the capitol of Egypt.  (refer http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/EGYPT/NEW.HTM

http://www.civilisations.ca/membrs/civiliz/egypt/egcrga2e.html

It is during this
period that the Israelites were slaves in Egypt, building the fortifications and
lavish statues and temples of Egypt.  During their 400 years of slavery, they
lost their patriarchal Yahwistic religion as they fell into Egyptian paganism.
Their epic exodus required a 40 year ‘cleansing’ period in the Wilderness,
before they could enter the ‘Promised Land of Israel’.

If during this exodus
they could build a golden calf idol,  would it be far-fetched to surmise that
they also carried the blemishes of Amen-worship with them into the future – a
seed which may not have been uprooted to this day?

Which brings us to our
2nd point of consideration:  The word ‘amen’ is popularly used in Hebrew liturgy
and Jewish worship.

True, the
root-letters  a-m-n hold the following connotations in modern Hebrew:

educate, train, true, trustworthy, confirm, confidence, faithfulness,
treaty.

Thirdly, its use in
modern day Judaism and Christianity:

The meaning for the
word ‘amen’ is given as “so be it”, “trustworthy”

Knowing the pagan idol
worship connotations of this word,  it does raise concern when one hears those
phrases which are so popularly used in Christian prayer:
“We ask this in Thy
Name, Amen”.
“We praise Thy Name, Amen.”
“We ask this in the Name which
is above every Name, Amen”.
“Praise the Lord” – with the communal response:
“Amen”.
These above applications surely can pass for directly addressing
someone named  ‘Amen’!  It should surely be conspicuous to the alert worshipper
of the One True God of Israel!

Similar usage is also
common in Jewish worship liturgy.

Should we use it in
prayer and worship?

The position assumed
in all the Restorative Truths proclaimed by BIBLE REVELATIONS, is to avoid
extremism.  This position is also maintained in our study on the use of  ‘God or Elohim’  and the use
of the various forms of The Sacred Name.

Like with all other
considerations in the process of the Restoration of the Original True Hebraic
Faith though,  the question remains:  “What does the Almighty expect from us?”
Our intentions may be pure, but why persist in clinging to habits and traditions
which have spurious origins or connotations?  Do we really need this word to
express our convictions and praises?

It also is curious,
that this almost mystical word, anciently referred to the “hidden god” – and it
would surely not be far-fetched to surmise that perhaps Satan has managed to
hide himself as the object of worship, to unsuspecting believer to this day?

Could this realization
and avoidance of such spurious terms lead us further from the Truth or closer to
it?

Is this not after all
the purpose of true and pure worship,  that we become aware of the traits and
methods of the Deceiver and refine and purify our worship as far as is humanly
possible?  What are we defending by hedging against doubtful practices?  There
are, after all,  ‘pure’ words like “HalleluYAH”, or where necessary, the Sacred
Name itself,  which can replace this questionable praise word ‘Amen’,

Ex. 23:13:“…and make no mention of the name  of other gods,
neither let it be heard out of your mouth.”

Hosea
2:17,19
  “I (YHVH) will take the
names
of the Baals (lords) off her (His Bride’s) lips”.

 


 

Recommended additional reading
666 – Zeus and the Mark of
the Beast

God or
Elohim?

The
Sacred Name

Click here to return to:
Index of Questions  & Answers

Main Page


Join our discussion Forum for updates and discussions

of the subjects featured on the BIBLE REVELATIONS Web
Site


Click on ‘Google’
to search for your topic on this site …  


 

Click on the following Banner to Read a FREE copy of the exciting
Book

about the Ancient Biblical Prophecies
regarding the soon Coming War of Wars!

 


 

Click
here
to contact he Publishers of this Web
Site
for further information, questions or comments

 

 


 

Site Map

 

 

 

The Main Page acts as the Site
Map to BIBLE REVELATIONS’  8 Libraries arranged by Topic

 

Follow the colour
coded links on the Main Page, similar to this:

 

Click here for

 

 

 


 

 

 
//

//
// ]]>


New World Order Plans to Use New Weapon to Decrease World Population

What is HAARP?  The acronym HAARP is short for High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program.  According  to the official HAARP website, “HAARP is a scientific endeavor aimed at  studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere, with particular  emphasis on being able to understand and use it to enhance  communications and surveillance systems for both civilian and defense  purposes.

However, there are differing points of view as to the real purpose of HAARP.  Some respected researchers say that secret electromagnetic warfare capabilities of HAARP are designed to support the US Military “stated goal” of achieving  full-spectrum dominance by the year 2020.  Others allege HAARP can and  has been used for weather modification, to cause earthquakes and  tsunamis, disrupt communication systems, and other unsavory, selective  scores.  The US Patent Office holds the patent provided by the key  developer of HAARP and other documentary evidence to support these  claims.

Major aspects of the program are kept “top secret” for alleged “national  security” reasons.  And yet, there is no doubt in the minds of many  that HAARP and electromagnetic weapons capable of being  used in warfare do, in fact, exist. However, this intrusion into the  ionosphere, the delicate upper layer of our atmosphere that ranges from  about 30-600 miles above the Earth’s surface, is not only  unconscionable, but frightening.

The HAARP website acknowledges that experiments using  electromagnetic frequencies to fire pulsed, directed energy beams to  “temporarily excite a limited area of the ionosphere” are conducted.   According to some scientists, purposely disturbing this sensitive layer  of our atmosphere could have major and disastrous consequences.   Concerned HAARP researchers have presented evidence that suggests these  disturbances can be used to trigger earthquakes and affect hurricanes.

Dr. Bernard Eastlund is the scientist whose name is most associated with  the creation and development of HAARP.  His website provides reliable  information concerning his involvement with the project.  A patent  entitled “Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth’s  atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere” was issued to Dr.  Eastlund.  In this patent, Dr. Eastlund makes a number of fascinating  statements which clearly contradict the claim that HAARP is only being used for research and not for military purposes or other purposes such as weather modification.

Some of Dr. Eastlunds statements in the patent include:

·         “The temperature of the ionosphere has been raised by hundreds of degrees in these experiments;

·         A means and method is provided to cause interference with or  even total disruption of communications over a very large portion of the  earth;

·         It is possible to take advantage of one or more such beams to  carry out a communications network even though the rest of the world’s  communications are disrupted;

·         This invention can be used to an advantage for positive communication and eavesdropping purposes;

·         Exceedingly large amounts of power can be very efficiently produced and transmitted”;

·         This invention has a phenomenal variety of potential future  developments.  “Weather modification is possible by, for example,  altering upper atmosphere wind patterns or altering solar absorption  patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles  which will act as a lens or focusing device.”  Therefore, ozone,  nitrogen, etc. concentrations in the atmosphere could be artificially  increased.

·         Electromagnetic pulse defenses are also possible.  “The  earth’s magnetic field could be decreased or disrupted at appropriate  altitudes to modify or eliminate the magnetic field.”

Two key documentaries; one by Canada’s public broadcasting network, CBC,  and the other by the History Channel, reveal the inner workings of HAARP.  The very well-researched CBC documentary includes this key quote:

“It isn’t just conspiracy theorists who are concerned about HAARP.   In January of 1999, the European Union called the project of global  concern and passed a resolution calling for more information on its  health and environmental risks.  Despite those concerns, officials at HAARP insist the project is nothing more sinister than a radio science research facility.”

Below are two quotes from the History Channel documentary:

“Electromagnetic weapons…pack an invisible wallop hundreds of times more  powerful than the electrical current in a lightning bolt.  One can  blast enemy missiles out of the sky, another could be used to bind  soldiers on the battlefield, still another to control an unruly crowd by  burning the surface of their skin.  If detonated over a large city, an  electromagnetic weapon could destroy all electronics in seconds.  They  all use directed energy to create a powerful electromagnetic pulse.”

“Directed energy is such a powerful technology it could be used to heat  the ionosphere to turn weather into a weapon of war.  Imagine using a  flood to destroy a city or tornados to decimate an approaching army in  the desert.  The military has spent a huge amount of time on weather  modification as a concept for battle environments.  If an  electromagnetic pulse went off over a city, basically all the electronic  things in your home would wink and go out, and they would be  permanently destroyed.”

For those “doubting Thomas’s” among you, a quote from an article in the  New Zealand Herald might convince you something is strange about this  program.

“Top-secret wartime experiments were conducted off the coast of Auckland  to perfect a tidal wave bomb, declassified files reveal.  United States  Defence Chiefs said that if the project had been completed before the  end of the war, it could have played a role as effective as that of the  atom bomb.  Details of the tsunami bomb, known as Project Seal, are  contained in 53-year old documents released by the Ministry of Foreign  Affairs and Trade.”

If the military secretly developed a weapon which would cause a tsunami  over a half century ago, what kind of advanced deadly weapons might be  available now? Is it any stretch of the imagination then to conclude the  military has the capability not only to cause a tsunami, but also to  affect man-made disasters such as earthquakes and hurricanes?

Could the earthquake in Haiti, the Indonesian tsunami, and hurricane  Katrina be HAARP experiments gone awry?  Of course, we COULD consider  these natural disasters.  However, with the evil capability of HAARP as an electromagnetic weapon of mass destruction, it is highly unlikely.

Read More…

Queen Elizabeth Direct Decendent of King David of Israel

The tracing of the kings and queens of the Royal House of David from Old to New Testament days is an exciting and rewarding study. Though it is sometimes suggested that our Royal House is of German origin, this is not factual. The rule of the Stuarts ended unhappily and Cromwell came to power; but, tiring of his discipline, the people restored the monarchy; thus the nearest lineal descendant of the Royal House of Stuart was sought.

British "Coat-of-Arms"British “Coat-of-Arms”The daughter of James I was Elizabeth, who married the King of Bohemia. Their daughter Sophia married the Elector of Hannover and their eldest son became George I of England. Thus, the great grandson of James I became King of Great Britain and Ireland in 1714, introducing into the sovereignty of this United Kingdom, the House of Hannover and of Brunswick.

Our present Queen, Queen Elizabeth, is a direct descendant of King David of the Old Testament.

Though it might be suggested that George I was half-German, this is not so, for his father, Earnest Augustus of Hannover, and his grandfather, Frederick of Bohemia, were both descended from Odin and Frea. Odin (or Wodin) was descended from Calcol and Dardan, who were Zara-Judah’s sons. Thus the alliance of Elisabeth and Sophia only strengthened the Judah line: thus, although some members of the Royal line resided in Germany for a period. German Kings never ruled Britain at any time.

The Royal College of Heralds in Britain accepts this direct line of descent from King David to Queen Elizabeth II as factual.

God said: “I have made a covenant with my chosen, I have sworn unto David my servant, Thy seed will I establish for ever, and build up thy throne to all generations. Selah” (PSALM 89:3-4).

Also we read in JEREMIAH 33:25-26, a very definite promise: “Thus saith the LORD; If my covenant be not with day and night, and if I have not appointed the ordinances of heaven and earth; Then will I cast away the seed of Jacob, and David my servant, so that I will not take any of his seed to be rulers over the seed of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob: for I will cause their captivity to return, and have mercy on them.”

The Arbroath Declaration

The Scottish Declaration of Independence, in Latin, is written on parchment and is now kept in Register House in Edinburgh. This ancient document, described by Register House officials as “probably our most precious possession,” is dated A.D. 1320, and bears the seals of Scottish barons assembled in Parliament under Robert the Bruce.

A translation taken from the “Scots Magazine,” April, 1934, pp. 16-18, reads:

“To the Most Holy Father in Christ and Lord, the Lord John, by divine providence Supreme Pontiff of the Holy Roman and Universal Church… Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations, our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian (Mediterranean) Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous.

Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today. The Britons they first drove out, the Picts they utterly destroyed, and even though very often assailed by the Norwegians, the Danes and the English, they took possession of that home with many victories and untold efforts; and, as the historians of old time bear witness, they have held it free of all bondage ever since. In their kingdom there have reigned one hundred and thirteen kings of their own royal stock, the line unbroken by a single foreigner.

The high qualities and deserts of these people, were they not otherwise manifest, gain glory from this: that the King of kings and Lord of lords, our Lord Jesus Christ, after His Passion and Resurrection, called them, even though settled in the uttermost parts of the earth, almost the first to His most holy faith. Nor would He have them confirmed in that faith by merely anyone but by the first of His Apostles by calling – though second or third in rank – the most gentle Saint Andrew, the Blessed Peter’s brother, and desired him to keep them under his protection as their patron for ever…”

 

The Lion and Unicorn People

“How goodly are thy tents, O Jacob, and thy tabernacles, O Israel!… God brought him forth out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn: he shall eat up the nations his enemies, and shall break their bones, and pierce them through with his arrows. He couched, he lay down as a lion, and as a great lion: who shall stir him up? Blessed is he that blesseth thee, and cursed is he that curseth thee” (NUMBERS 24:5-9).

The only people represented today by the lion and unicorn together are the British people. The Royal coat of arms has on one side of the central shield a crowned lion representing a royal kingdom, and on the other side a unicorn with a chain around it representing strength.

Source: ‘Voice of Revival’


Abraham an Egyptian Pharoh

King
Abraham

by Ralph
Ellis

If I indicated that biblical Abraham was a pharaoh of
Egypt, would it appear to be an utterly absurd figment of a deranged mind?
Initially that may seem so, but this is only because we have grown so used to
the orthodox ecclesiastical creed that we have forgotten that the Biblical
Abraham was in fact a very powerful man. Josephus, the first century Jewish
historian says of Abraham:

Pharaoh Necho, king of Egypt at the time, descended on
this land with an immense army and seized Sarah the Princess, mother of our
nation. And what did our forefather Abraham do? Did he avenge the insult by
force of arms? Yet he had three hundred and eighteen officers under him, with
unlimited manpower at his disposal!

Three hundred and eighteen officers, not men, under his
command, it was obviously quite a sizable army that Abraham had at his disposal
– possibly running into the tens of thousands. In this case, the image I have
portrayed above is not quite so absurd, at the most it is just an embellishment
on what the texts say, for they do not explain from what lands and over what
peoples Abraham was such a leader. Yet how many options do we really have, how
many nations in this era would have such a powerful army? This simple
observation, holds within it the key to the fundamentals of modern theology and
these are far removed from the Christmas card images that we are so familiar
with. It is somehow explained to us by the clergy that the whole of the Western
world were suddenly transfixed by the philosophy of a family of nomadic
sheep-herders wandering around the Negev desert, a family who had held their
traditions through thousands of years – and all this at a time when most such
individuals were illiterate. This is the fantasy!

The truth is rather different and rather more believable –
Abraham, pharaoh of Egypt, master of all he surveyed, the most powerful man in
the world. Now this would be a real story to set the scribes scribbling, the
story of his sons, of his forefathers, of his mighty deeds and works. Like the
tales of all kings, each and every schoolchild would be forced to learn by rote
the names and accomplishments of the royal family, it would be ingrained into
the national psyche. This is the kind of family that can trace their history
back through 70 generations, as could Jesus, this is the kind of family that
could spawn a billion books. Jesus’ nation, the Jews, have always had an
overriding fascination with genealogy, but why should this be so? The reason is
now clear, with their aristocracy perhaps descended from a line of semi-divine
kings and descended from the mighty Egyptian empire, I think we have all the
explanations necessary. Royal dynasties to this day have the same fascination
for their family history, for the family’s entire existence depends solely on
proving their legitimacy.

Shepherds

But if the biblical family were pharaohs of Egypt, should we
not see them in the historical record? Indeed so, but first of all the precise
era to study needs to be decided and the clue to this comes from the Bible. The
patriarchs in the Bible are known as being shepherds, as I have just indicated,
in fact the Bible is quite specific about this point. Joseph’s family are asked
by pharaoh:

What is your occupation? And they said … Thy servants
are shepherds, both we, and also our fathers.

This point is not just interesting, it is fundamental to
understanding what the Bible is trying to tell us. For it just so happens that a
whole dynasty of pharaohs were known as shepherds! These were the pharaohs who,
in the historical record, had ‘invaded’ northern Egypt during the 14th to 16th
dynasties and these peoples were known as the Hyksos, a term which translates as
‘Shepherd King’. Clearly we have a very obvious and very strong link here – in
fact it is amazing that so little has been said about this coincidence. There is
a great deal of synergy here, the Bible mentions a very special family line of
Shepherds of which it says the Òkings will come out of youÓ and likewise the
historical record tells us that some of the pharaohs of northern Egypt were
called Shepherd Kings. It was a similarity that was just crying out to be
investigated and the results of this scrutiny were quite astounding.

To start this process is has to be assumed that the Bible
contains a real historical record, yet many people may look at the Bible as
something completely alien to the real world. We have the real history provided
for us by the archaeologists and then there is the theological history of the
Bible, Koran and Torah – yet it seems at times that the two records are mutually
exclusive. Nothing in the theological record really ties in with the historical
one, it is almost as if the biblical story occurred on another planet! Nothing
could be further from the truth, in reality the Bible and the historical record
continuously merge into one – if one knows how to interpret what is being
said.

The key to this entire conundrum was the term shepherd, for
why should an Egyptian pharaoh wish to be known as a shepherd? The answer lay in
the Egyptian records and their fascination with astrology, this just had to be a
stellar reference, these kings were being compared to the constellation of
Aries. With this concept firmly in the back of the mind, the Bible suddenly
started to release its long hidden secrets: for there are numerous references to
sheep and cattle in the Bible and although the subject matter fitted the quaint
pastoral image being plied by the clergy, none of them made any literal sense.
But suitably translated, with the sheep becoming the constellation of Aries (or
their followers) and the cattle as Taurus (and their followers), everything
fitted into place.

As has been alluded to in previous books, the constellations
move slowly with the millennia and each era has a ruling constellation, the
current one being Pisces. But back in the 13th 14th dynasty, they were on the
cusp of a change in the constellations, between Taurus and Aries. The era of
Taurus lasted until about 1800 BC, when Aries came into ascendance, this date is
not only very close to both the era of the first Hyksos pharaohs and the arrival
of Abraham in the Bible, but I would also suggest that this change in the
constellations caused a social rift between the Apis Bull worshippers in Thebes
(the Taureans) and the Hyksos Shepherd pharaohs in the north (the Arians). The
country was divided, there was civil war – just as the historical records
indicate.

Evidence

The Bible has direct evidence that shows this to be true and
in addition the following quote seems to be a verbatim conversation that has
been preserved for some 3,500 years. The scene is set by the 3rd century BC
Egyptian historian Manetho, who indicates (as does the Bible) that there were
actually two exoduses from Egypt – one being a major migration and the other a
much smaller exodus of priests. After the first exodus, the patriarch Joseph (he
with the coat of many colours, ie a priests stole) goes back to Egypt and rises
to become the most powerful man in Egypt, save from the pharaoh himself. Joseph
asks his family to join him in Egypt, but he has a warning for them.

(Paraphrased) You are shepherds as you know, and your
duty is to feed the cattle… And it shall come to pass that pharaoh will call
you, and shall say what is your occupation. You must say in return that your
trade has been cattle from our youth even until now, both we and also our
fathers. Otherwise you will not be allowed to stay in the land of Egypt, for we
shepherds are an abomination to the Egyptians.
Genesis
46:32

What could Joseph possibly mean by this statement? It is not
as if the Egyptians had any prohibitions on the eating of sheep meat, so why was
the pharaoh so interested in the occupation of the brothers and why was the
lowly but honourable profession of shepherd so despised? The solution is simple,
a couple of words have been altered by the scribes to give the conversation an
agricultural bias, but in truth they were discussing the most important topic in
Egypt – religion. Replacing the words with their original astrological
counterparts, the full import of the statement becomes dramatically clear.

(Paraphrased) You are Hyksos/Arians as you know, and your
duty is to convert the followers of Taurus … And it shall come to pass that
pharaoh will call you, and shall say what is your religion. You must say in
return that your religion has been Taurean from our youth even until now, both
we and also our fathers. Otherwise you will not be allowed to stay in the land
of Egypt, for we Hyksos/Arians are an abomination to the
Egyptians.

Suddenly it becomes dramatically obvious why the Egyptians
thought that shepherds were an abomination. This was not a reference to a
profession, but to a religion and an entire nation – the Hyksos. Egypt had just
been through a bitter and bloody civil war with these peoples, a war between
southern and northern Egypt which resulted in the Exodus of the Hyksos peoples
and the destruction of much of the northern delta lands. Of course the
‘shepherds’ were an abomination to the (southern) Egyptians – they were the
Hyksos Shepherds!

Suddenly the Bible makes sense, there is valid historical
data to be found if we know what to look for. Forget the picture postcard images
of simple nomadic farmers – enter the tortuous dynastic alliances and political
machinations of the most powerful people in the world in that era – the pharaohs
of Egypt. Joseph was, by the admission of the Bible, the vizier to the pharaoh,
the second most powerful man in the world. It is not a great extension of this
biblical history to say that the other members of this important family were
even more powerful, that they sat on the throne itself.

Further evidence that this is the correct interpretation to
be placed upon the Old Testament writings is provided by the later works in the
New Testament. Jesus, who was descended from the same family as the patriarchs,
was born as a Lamb of God. In other words he was a young Shepherd (Hyksos)
prince in exile, he was just a lamb for the time being. As Jesus matured to
become a Shepherd, another momentous event was happening in the skies above; at
just this precise era the constellation of Aries started to wane in the heavens
and Pisces came into the ascendance. Accordingly Jesus changed his title
according to the age-old tradition, the young shepherd became a Fisher of Men, a
king of Pisces. The first of the Grail romance “Fisher Kings” had been
crowned.

Jacoba

So if the biblical patriarchs were indeed pharaohs of Egypt,
why are they not to be found in the historical record? One of the simplest ways
of looking for evidence for this biblical pharaonic family, would be among the
all important and diligently recorded family names of the patriarchs.

Unfortunately, however, the very line of kings that we wish
to research is the most fragmentary in the historical record, but nevertheless,
some progress can be made. As a starting point in this search, take a look at an
encyclopaedia of the pharaohs of Egypt and flick through the pages until you
reach the sixteenth dynasty, the period that covers the last of the Hyksos
pharaohs. The last pharaoh listed is Yacobaam, a name not unrelated to that of
the patriarch Jacob. Many deliberations on this similarity are made within the
book “Jesus Last of the Pharaohs”, including the removal of the ‘m’ at the end
of the name, which is likely to be a ‘determinative’ glyph. The resulting
conclusion has to be that there is a direct connection here.


Fig 1 The
cartouche for Yacobaam

Suddenly the Biblical Jacob, father of Joseph, becomes the
historical Jacoba, a Hyksos Egyptian pharaoh. This is a revolution in theology,
but it is only a small step in a long process of uncovering the truth. The
Biblical family is about to be transformed in terms of its political and secular
importance. We have found the first bunch of grapes on this ancient royal
vine.

This is the radical theory that underpins the whole of the book
“Jesus, Last of the Pharaohs”. It is a real story, constantly backed up by the
ancient text themselves. The first step towards this transformation is to
readjust our perceptions of the past. Throw out the years of established dogma
that clouds our normally rational and critical analysis of the world and look at
history anew. See the incredible tale of a ruling dynasty that has managed to
cling to the greasy pole of history, despite the millennia of misunderstandings
and persecutions, a family that is not even recognised by the faithful that
worship them to this day. The Torah and Old Testament were never intended to be
simple tales of Asiatic tribes and sheep herders. The true story is a complete
history of the ruling family of Egypt, the ‘Royal Bloodline’. It is a history
that can both solve the mysteries of man’s dim and distant past and also tell us
something of our future destiny.

Bloodline

Working through the Bible looking for pharaohs was an interesting
task, but although this may seem to be a bizarre field of study, nevertheless
coincidences seemed to fall out of the texts like confetti. Each of the names in
the table below has only required small changes to the pharaonic names, each
made using the standard techniques that all Egyptologists use, to reform
themselves into their Biblical equivalents. This is not ‘cheating’, for
Egyptologists do not know themselves how these names are supposed to be
pronounced. Should the name Stephen, for instance, be pronounced Steven or
Step-hen? Without a guide it is impossible to know. Now we have our guide, the
Torah, Bible and Koran will instruct us as to how these ancient names should be
pronounced. Using this simple technique of name comparison, suddenly the texts
come alive with historical kings:

After a long list of biblical pharaohs we finally come to another
pharaoh, the one mentioned by the historian Josephus at the beginning of the
article – Necho. Looking down the historical record for an equivalent pharaoh
reveals that the closest match is Nehesy, a fifteenth dynasty pharaoh. This link
may not seem totally convincing at this stage, but remember that Egyptologists
are uncertain of the exact pronunciation here so the name Nehesy could also be
seen as being pronounced as Nehosy, each is a valid transliteration. It is also
significant that the name of Abraham’s wife was Sarah, which is quite possibly a
derivation of this same pharaoh’s throne name, which was Aasehra.

Abraham

So perhaps Necho and Nehesy were simply different renditions of
the ‘first name’ of this pharaoh. Looking at the Bible we find a possible third
translation of this name, that of Nachor, the grand-father of Abraham. Have we
found another Biblical pharaoh? The Biblical Nachor and Josephus’ pharaoh called
Necho seem far too close for comfort. To find out for sure we could always
compare the family histories involved, comparing the sons and grand-sons for
instance. The son of the Biblical Nachor was Thara, whereas the son of the
pharaoh Nehesy was Sheshi. Thus far, this is not looking too promising.

But wait just a minute, the throne-name of the pharaoh Nehesy is
Aasahra and this seems to equate very nicely with the Biblical Thara; it looks
as if the Bible has simply dropped the initial ‘A’ in the name. The fact that
there was an original ‘A’ attached to this Biblical name is confirmed by the
same stories that occur in the Koran, where the same individual (the father of
Abraham) is called Azar. The Koran, however, seems to have lost the ‘a’ at the
end of the name, it has lost the suffix of this name instead of the prefix. but
if we conjoin the two patriarchal names of Azar and Thara, we either derive the
name Aathara or Azara. All in all, it would appear that the pharaonic name of
Aasahra has been preserved rather well over the years in these religious
texts.

What we now have is the father and grand-father of Abraham being
joined into just one individual in the Egyptian historical record, where he is
listed under the two names of the pharaoh Nehesy. If we quite legitimately
change the second vowel in the name Nehesy to an ‘o’, we thus derive:

The historical Pharaoh: Nehosy (Aasahra)
The Biblical
Patriarch: Nachor (Azarah)

This is a very satisfying arrangement. However the whole edifice
we have just built up, seems to fall down on the count of one glaring error –
the son of Nehesy. The Biblical Nachor (Azarah) fathered Abraham himself. Yet if
we look at the historical record, the son of Nehesy (Aasarah) is this pharaoh
called Sheshi, this is truly unsatisfactory and it seems to undermine all the
progress that has been made so far.

Actually this is not so, it was just the result that was needed to
finally convince me, and perhaps the reader, that this was not all wishful
thinking, that this line of Biblical pharaohs is a historical reality. Why?
Because the throne name of the pharaoh Sheshi is none other than Mayebre or
Mamayebra. This name not only sounds like Abraham, with the ‘M’ displaced to the
end, it is quite possibly another very simple and possibly deliberate
mistranslation of it. The cartouche of Mamayebra looks like this:


Fig 2.
Cartouche of Mayebra
Mam-aye-bra ~ Ay-bra-ham.

What better way to hide the name of a pharaoh, than simply moving
the first syllable to the end of the name. So subtle and yet so effective was
the ploy, that the truth lay hidden for thousands of years – Abraham was a
pharaoh of Egypt. The Bible seems to admit this possibility, even if theologians
will not; of Abraham it says:

For a father of many nations I have made thee. And I shall
make thee exceedingly fruitful … and kings shall come out of
thee.

The true royal status of Abraham can be seen once more, it is just
as the biblical texts tell us, “… and kings shall come out of thee.” Now the
ma’at, the truth, can be told; the Biblical patriarchs were indeed powerful
people, they were pharaohs of Egypt.

Jesus

This line of Biblical pharaohs is the baton that “Jesus, Last of
the Pharaohs” takes up and runs with. Here we have the outline for an entirely
new history of Egypt and Palestine. The great Exodus can be seen in an entirely
new light, with the causes and ramifications of this historic event falling on
the shoulders of Egypt herself, it was nothing more or less than an internal
dispute – a civil war. Jesus too, sprang from this royal vine, he too was a
pharaoh of Egypt, but a pharaoh in exile. Egypt was no longer seen as being
their rightful property by the royal dynasty at this time, but the traditions
and influences of Egypt were still strong enough that the young Jesus was sent
there to receive his education; they were also strong enough for the ‘lamb’ to
pronounce himself a Fisher of Men – the ancient traditions were still being
adhered to. We continue to follow the ministry of Jesus and find many references
to his royal stature, plus some ‘new’, very interesting and contemporary
historical references that place Jesus in a real historical context. He was
described by his detractors in that era as being the ‘Egyptian False Prophet’,
he was also the governor of Tiberias and he later tried to take Jerusalem back
from the rebel Jewish factions by force of arms with 600 men from his base on
the Mount of Olives, an event that is described in the Bible in dramatically
similar phrases.

The book “Jesus, Last of the Pharaohs” runs with this theme
through thick and thin, for the results of this new theological interpretation
can sometimes be both shocking and profound. But this is not an idea born in a
vacuum, every step of the way the ancient texts assure us that this was the true
history – one just needs to know the key to unlock these long forgotten secrets
and the will to embrace them.

Lastly we need to address the ramifications of this research, for
they are many. For, to the orthodox believer of the three Judaic religions this
whole concept may appear to be a heresy to be mocked and derided, but I hope
there are many readers out there with more open minds. The Jewish and Christian
hierarchy have delivered a simple creed to us, but it is one that is not fully
supported by the texts. They have taught us a tale of simple shepherds, but the
texts say again and again, from Abraham to Jesus, that these people were kings.
All I have done is to take the texts at their word and built a story on those
foundations. To understand this new creed does demand a readjustment to ones
religious outlook, but it is not as big an adjustment as one might expect. The
trade here, for Christians in particular, is one that dissolves the unique
divinity of Jesus but it delivers in return a Christian history that is
traceable back to the very start of the historical world, back into pre-dynastic
Egypt and beyond. It means that the family of Jesus and their descendants, can
trace their history through every Egyptian pharaoh, the longest recorded family
history in the world. Personally, I find such concepts both fascinating and
tantalising, it detracts nothing from the religious world to think that Jesus
was, perhaps, the Last of the Pharaohs.

© 1998, 1999 by R.
Ellis

R. Ellis has asserted his rights, in
accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identified as
the author of this work.

All rights reserved. Without limiting the
rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any
means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without
the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher. Any
person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be
liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages.

Website designed by Artifice Design


Great Britain Ownership of America Exposed

Please read indepth article supporting the facts in this report: http://www.avoiceforchildren.com/news/2002/November/queen_is_exposed.htm

Thank
you Rebekah Sutherland for this comprehensive article outlining the
relationships between the contracts of England and the United States, a
corporate scheme from the beginning. In l997 when the Social Securities document
was discovered coming from the Queens Post Office, we had just started our
website and had a copy of the original of the document referred to below on our
site then.

In l997 a handful of scholars were saying the BAR was the
core of the fraud we were all running into. People said they were “fringe”
outcasts, and ignored their research. Now the research as well as the actions of
the BAR members have exposed patterns that are clear and certain that the
International Bar Association, the British Bar Association, the American Bar
Association and the state BAR’s ARE the operatives of the global corporate
scheme that has undermined the Sovereignty of the People, in the United States
being the Bill of Rights that protects human Inherent Rights from agressions of
outlaw or unconstitutional governments including our own.

Another part
directly is the slavery issue, and the double standard of “law”. The BAR agents
and associates are all judges and attorneys and Big Corp CEO’s. At the same time
that the first Bank was created, a Treasury Court was created within Article II.
Not an Article III court of general jurisdiction, or of the people, but a court
of limited jurisdiction to hear commerce cases. Later, that Article II court was
brought into the lawful jurisdiction of the Article III process. That court is
called the Court of International Trade and sets in New York.

Today this
is the only known Article III judges setting. All other courts are “established”
in the “one supreme Court” BEING the Article III court. Please read on our
website on Newswire more about this court. Bottom line in lay terms, the BAR has
always and still been in control of the “courts” for monetary interests NOT the
people. They have created a process for themselves which they enforce as well to
be able to violate the public trust without appearing to break the law. It is
all statutory fraud being enforced upon the slaves. When slavery was “abolished”
all that was done was a new restricted status of “US Citizen” was created and
state rights abolished and all became a corporate “state”, one big
company.

What was abolished was “involuntary servitude” but NOT VOLUNTARY
SERVITUDE. They changed the language in all the states constitutions , amended
to incorporate all kinds of “implied consent” compelled contracts on the
freeborn sovereign people in the states. In order to sell this opression and not
be blatant, it was sold to us as licenses, fines, taxes, all forms of statutory
restrictions against freeborn innocent people. All that happened with that is
they make you out of belief or fear to comply. That is all. And that is what the
people in mass NOW must say NO to every bit of it to stop their outlaw human
rendering machine. In court the agencies actually SAY that all infants are
VOLUNTARY handed over to the state, and that all people forced into programs and
fines, etc VOLUNTEER for these “services”….. like a business, but you dont get
a choice to shop at some other store…..

At the end of this article is a
link to another article, sent out last year when England foreclosed on US
mortgages, after the federal courts failed to protect their interests. The
schemes are public now, the racketeering and conflict of interest obscene. The
first step is seeing it, the next to stop allowing it to continue. The humans
are the sovereign authority, not corporate fictions and their representatives.
It is up to us to excercise it, and force public servants and elected
representatives and officials to submit to that UNLAIENABLE authority. pamela
gaston, a voice for children

From: Becworks@aol.com URGENT: GET THIS TO
AMERICAN CITIZENS

I have my copy of the treaty signed by Ben Franklin
with the British Crown by which these things have come to pass. Forwarded by
R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed.
************************************************************* Category: News
& Opinion Topic: Constitution & Civil Liberties Synopsis: Legally, we’re
owned by the Pope-controlled Queen Elizabeth II ;live under Babylonian Talmudic
law Source: APFN Published: April 9, 2001 Author: Stephen Ames For Education and
Discussion Only. Not for Commercial Use.

Queen Elizabeth controls and has
amended U.S. Social Security, as follows:

S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social
Security ( United States of America) Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming
into force 1st September 1997. At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of
July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty an pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and
(2) of the Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers
enabling Her in that behalf, is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council,
to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows:

“This Order may be cited
as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into
force on 1st September 1997.”

Does this give a new meaning to Federal
Judge William Wayne Justice stating in court that he takes his orders from
England? This order goes on to redefine words in the Social Security Act and
makes some changes in United States Law.

Remember, King George was the
“Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and c, and of the
United States of America.” See: Treaty of Peace (1738) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large.
Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope, is in charge of the USA
‘plantation.’

What people do not know is that the so called Founding
Fathers and King George were working hand-n-hand to bring the people of America
to there knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a
debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the UNITED
STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war. See
Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15)

Now, you also have
to realize that King George was not just the King of England, he was also the
King of France. Treaty of Peace * U.S. 8 Statutes at Large 80.

On January
22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the repayment of 21 loans that the
UNITED STATES had already received dating from February 28, 1778 to July 5,
1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King money which is due January 1,
1788 from King George via France. Is this not incredible the King funded both
sides of the War. But there was more work that needed to be done. Now the
Articles of Confederation which was declared in force March 1, 1781 States in
Article 12 ” All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed,and debts contracted
by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United
States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and
considered a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction
whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly
pledged.”

Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was
nothing more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, they were
not done yet.

Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened
in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic instability of the country under
the Articles of Confederation. Only five States come to the meeting, but there
is a call for another meeting to take place in Philadelphia the following year
with the express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation

On
February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take place in
Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of confederation. Something
had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people know that the so
called founding fathers were acutely going to reorganize the United States
because it was Bankrupt.

On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates
approve the Constitution. The States have now become Constitutors. Constitutor:
In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the
payment of another’s debt. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. The States were now
liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people of America were not because
they were not a party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a
vote On August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was Titled.-An Act making
provision for the payment of the Debt of the United States. This can be found at
1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act for all intents and purposes
abolished the States and Created the Districts. If you don’t believe it look it
up. The Act set up Federal Districts, here in Pennsylvania we got two. In this
Act each District was assigned a portion of the debt. The next step was for the
states to reorganize their governments which most did in 1790. This had to be
done because the States needed to legally bind the people to the debt. The
original State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for a vote. So
the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to people for a vote
thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great Britain. The people became
citizens of the State where they resided and ipso facto a citizen of the United
States. A citizen is a member of a fictional identity and it is synonymous with
subject.

What you think is a state is in reality a corporation, in other
words, a Person.

“Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person.” 9 F. Supp 272
“Word “person” does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.

There are no
states, just corporations. Every body politic on this planet is a corporation. A
corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your
mind. They are images in your mind, that speak to you. We labor, pledge our
property and give our children to a fiction.

Now before we go any further
let us examine a few things in the Constitution.

Article six section one
keeps the loans from the King valid it states; All Debts contracted and
Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as
valid against the United States under this constitution, as under the
Confederation.

Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article One
Section Eight clause Two which states that Congress has the power to borrow
money on the credit of the United States. This was needed so the United States
(Which went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then
because the States were a party to the Constitution they would also be liable
for it.

The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States
Bank in 1791. This was a private Bank of which there were 25,000 shares issued
of which 18,000 were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the United States
money in exchange for Securities of the United States

Now the creditors
of the United States which included the King wanted paid the Interest on the
loans that were given to the United States. So Alexander Hamilton came up with
the great idea of taxing alcohol.The people resisted so George Washington sent
out the militia to collect the tax which they did. This has become known as the
Whiskey rebellion. It is the Militia’s duty to collect taxes. How did the United
States collect taxes off of the people if the people are not a party to the
Constitution? I’ll tell you how. The people are slaves! The United States
belongs to the floundering fathers and their posterity and Great Britain.
America is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been. How many times
have you seen someone in court attempt to use the Constitution and then the
Judge tells him he can’t. It is because you are not a party to it. We are
SLAVES!!!!!!! If you don’t believe read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor
and Aldermen of the City of Savannah.

14 Georgia 438, 520 which states ”
But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the
ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a
compact but he is not a party to it.”

Now back to the Militia. Just read
Article One Section Eight clause (15) which states that it is the militia’s job
to execute the laws of the Union. Now read Clause (16) Which states that
Congress has the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the
Militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service
of the United States…. the Militia is not there to protect you and me, it is
their to collect our substance.

As you can plainly see all the
Constitution did is set up a Military Government to guard the King’s commerce
and make us slaves.

If one goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large 116-132 you
will find “The Treaty of Amity, Commerce and Navigation. This Treaty was signed
on November 19th, 1794 which was twelve years after the War. Article 2 of the
Treaty states that the King’s Troops were still occupying the United States.
Being the nice King that he was , he decided that the troops would return to
England by June 1st, 1796. The troops were still on American soil because, quite
frankly the King wanted them here.

Here is the key to were this
started:

Many people tend to blame the Jews for our problems. Jewish Law
governs the entire world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY
PRESIDENT SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit:

“Everything in the Babylonian
Talmud is binding on all Israel. Every town and country must follow all customs,
give effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactment’s of the Talmudic sages,
because the entire Jewish people accepted everything contained in Talmud. The
sages who adopted the enactment’s and decrees, instituted the practices,
rendered the decisions, and derived the laws, constituted all or most of the
Sages of Israel. It is they who received the tradition of the fundamentals of
the entire Torah in unbroken succession going back to Moses, our
teacher.”

We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in
the subject Index, Mammon is defined as (“Civil law and procedure”).

Now
turn to the “The Shetars Effect on English Law” — A Law of the Jews Becomes the
Law of the Land, found in “The George Town Law Journal, Vol 71: pages
1179-1200.” It is clearly stated in the Law Review that the Jews are the
property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains that the Talmud
is the law of the land. It explains how the Babylonian Talmud became the law of
the land, which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code. The written credit
agreement — the Jewish shetar is a lien on all property (realty) and today it’s
called the mortgage! The treatise also explains that the Jews are owned by Great
Britain and the Jews are in charge of the Baking system.

We are living
under the Babylonian Talmud, it is were all of our problems come from. It was
brought into England in 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, Kings and the
Christian churches ever since. It is total and relentless mind control, people
are taught to believe in things that do not exist.

Now before you scream
that the UCC is unconstitutional I’m sorry people, you are not a party to any
constitution. Read the case cite below.

“But, indeed, no private person
has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the
Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party
to it.” Padelford, Fay & Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah
14 Ga. 438, 520

You have to understand that Great Britain,(Article six
Section one) the United States and the States are the parties to the
Constitution not you. Let me try to explain. If I buy an automobile from a man
and that automobile has a warranty and the engine blows up the first day I have
it. Then I tell the man just forget about it. Then you come along and tell the
man to pay me and he says no. So you take him to court for not holding up the
contract. The court then says case dismissed. Why ?
Bec

Main Page – Friday, 02/04/05

 

Message Board by American Patriot
Friends Network [APFN]

 

APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES

messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)