Tag Archives: Religious Conspiracy

Great Britain a Hebrew Covenant

Great Britain a Hebrew Covenant

A little known fact outside of Archaeological circles is becoming ever more
known.

There is no Archaeological evidence that Hebrews lived as slaves in Egypt,
or that there was an exodus out of Egypt or that Moses led them out.

Not one shred of Archaeological evidence of millions of Jews wandering the
desert for forty years, surely there would be pottery or tools or some kind of
evidence left behind. Nor is there evidence of the Bibles main cast of Hebrew
characters.

Abraham, Joseph, Jacob, Moses, Solomon or David

There is however plenty of evidence of the
Egyptian Pharaoh’s who these biblical characters are based on.

The bibles Old Testament has carefully covered up
the connections between the Egyptian Pharaoh’s and Hebrew Patriarchs by mixing
up historical facts with myth and legends.

Modern Archaeologist have confirmed that the
Hebrews were not a race of people like once thought, they were a Semitic and
Asiatic class of foreign workers who migrated into Egypt from neighboring lands
in search of work as craftsman and builders, as their population grew over
hundreds of years they intermarried with the Egyptians and gradually rose to
positions of influence and wealth in Egypt.

Abram married his sister Sari; at Gods command angry
at the incestuous relationship he ordered them to change their names to Abraham
and Sarah. They then went to Egypt, where Abraham turned his Sister/Wife over
to the Pharaoh as a sex slave and was rewarded with gold and silver.

In 1818 Antonio Lebolo made a revolutionary
discovery that identified Abraham as an Egyptian Pharaoh during excavation in
the Valley of the Kings; he exhumed eleven Egyptian mummies along with rolls of
papyrus inscribed with hieroglyphic writings and drawings. One of the drawings
depicted Abraham sitting on the Pharaoh’s throne. Abrahams name was also
deciphered on a roll of papyrus. Joseph Smith published his controversial
findings in the “Book of Abraham” in 1842 and was murdered two years later. Today
the only Egyptian Tomb forbidden to the public is the tomb of Amenemhet 1 who
many researchers now believe is the biblical Abraham. The Pharaoh Amenemhet
worshiped Amen, the question then becomes is God and Amen the same. In the
Egyptian version, Amen also turned a river into blood.

There is ever increasing evidence that Pharaoh
Tutmoses 111 was actually Moses. Pharaoh Tsusennes was actually King David.

Why would the Hebrew authors of the Bible hide
the fact that the biblical characters were really Pharaohs? Bible and Egyptian
scholars concluded that the Jews had to hide their identity the same way Joseph
did and change their names if they were to retain power and rule Egypt. And
their lineage has continued to rule until this day.

Hebrew authors covered this up to hide the fact
that Hebrews and Egyptians shared the same royal bloodline. After the Egyptians
forced the Hebrew Hicksos out of Egypt the only way they could continue to rule
was to hide their identity from the Egyptian people and the Hebrews.

They continued to rule secretly and intermarried
with Egyptians and worshiped Gods and violated Jewish Hebrew law. They kept
their identities hidden in secret societies and royal power circles just as
they have done until this day.

The descendents of the Hebrew Pharaohs of Egypt
have ruled throughout history, through the millennia they have left oceans of
blood in their wake, they have murdered, cheated, slaughtered, robbed,
colonized and enslaved to fulfill their biblical covenants to maintain one
throne and one world empire.

Great Britain is a Hebrew covenant. Queen
Elizabeth 11 is a direct descendent from the long line of Hebrew Kings all the
way to King David, consequently all the way to Adam. This is according to the “College
of Heralds” in London.

The United Kingdom’s Coat of Arms depicts the
lion of the tribe of Judah in the pre- eminent right hand position, wearing the
crown, The Unicorn (Bull) of Ephraim of equal stature with the lion. The harp
of David recognizes the Davidic covenant and symbolizes the marriage of the two
lines of Judah in Ireland, through Jeremiah.

The Stone of Destiny is the stone that Jacob used as a pillow and had a
dream in which he saw a stairway to heaven. The Old Testament referred to this
stone as the “Rock”. The stone has rested in Westminster Abbey for 700 years
beneath the coronation chair before it was moved back to Edinburgh Scotland.
This is where the house of Israel relocated and it was the tribe of Ephraim who
were the caretakers of this anointed stone.

Queen Elizabeth is the 122nd lineal descendent of King David who
is of the tribe of Judah.

                                                Written By: Bo Ajala

Advertisements

Amen a Pagan Deity (Literally means “The Hidden One”) Hidden throughout the Bible

In the Bibles Old Test (amen)t,  Amen is hidden through out. The word literally means ” The Hidden One” 1 Kings verse 36 – Amen is described as “The Lord God of my God” Many are led to believe that it means “So be it” or “Truly”.

Q: “Is Amen’ the name of a pagan idol?  Should we
refrain from using this word in our prayers and in
worship?”

Answer:


 

Let us consider this word on the following levels:
–  Its pagan
connotations
–  Its use and meaning in Hebrew
–  Its use in Christianity
and Judaism
–  Should we use it or not?

 

Amen’ was one of
the main deities in Egyptian mythology, the worship of which  spread to Greece,
Syria and surroundings.

 

According to ‘The
Concise Columbia Encyclopedia’,  Columbia University Press.  Copyright © 1991 by
Columbia University Press:

Amon (â´men, ä´-)
or Ammon (à´men) or Amen (ä´mèn), ancient Egyptian deity. Originally the chief
god of Thebes, Amon grew increasingly important in Egypt, and eventually, as
Amon Ra, he was identified with RA as the supreme deity. He was also identified
with the Greek ZEUS (the Roman JUPITER).
(Ed.: Jupiter
or ‘Zues-Pater’ – ‘Zeus our father’).

The Official Internet Site of The Egyptian
Ministry of Tourism

has the following Web Pages with information about
Amen, the primeval idol:
Amen (Amon)
and Amen-Ra, King of the  Gods, and the Triad of Thebes

Amen worship
Amen of Thebes
Forms of Amen-Ra


Here are some excerpts from these informative
pages.
“Amen was the personification of the hidden and  unknown creative
power which was associated with the primeval abyss, gods in the creation of  the
world, and all that is in it. The word or root amen, certainly means “what is
hidden,” “what  is not seen,” “what cannot be seen,” and the like, and this fact
is proved by scores of examples  which may be collected from texts of all
periods. In hymns to Amen we often read that he is  “hidden to his children,
“and “hidden to gods and men” … Now, not only is the god himself said  to be
“hidden,” but his name also is “hidden,” and his form, or similitude, is said to
be  “unknown;” these statements show that “hidden,” when applied to Amen, the
great god, has  reference to something more than the “sun which has disappeared
below the horizon,” and that it indicates the god who cannot be seen with the
mortal eyes, and who is invisible, as well as inscrutable, to gods as well as
men.”

Amen, his wife, Mut,
and their son, Khonsu, represented the Theban Triad, the sacred family of
Thebes. Amen was the “King of the gods” during the period of the New Kingdom in
Egypt 1550-1070 B.C.E. when Thebes was the capitol of Egypt.  (refer http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/EGYPT/NEW.HTM

http://www.civilisations.ca/membrs/civiliz/egypt/egcrga2e.html

It is during this
period that the Israelites were slaves in Egypt, building the fortifications and
lavish statues and temples of Egypt.  During their 400 years of slavery, they
lost their patriarchal Yahwistic religion as they fell into Egyptian paganism.
Their epic exodus required a 40 year ‘cleansing’ period in the Wilderness,
before they could enter the ‘Promised Land of Israel’.

If during this exodus
they could build a golden calf idol,  would it be far-fetched to surmise that
they also carried the blemishes of Amen-worship with them into the future – a
seed which may not have been uprooted to this day?

Which brings us to our
2nd point of consideration:  The word ‘amen’ is popularly used in Hebrew liturgy
and Jewish worship.

True, the
root-letters  a-m-n hold the following connotations in modern Hebrew:

educate, train, true, trustworthy, confirm, confidence, faithfulness,
treaty.

Thirdly, its use in
modern day Judaism and Christianity:

The meaning for the
word ‘amen’ is given as “so be it”, “trustworthy”

Knowing the pagan idol
worship connotations of this word,  it does raise concern when one hears those
phrases which are so popularly used in Christian prayer:
“We ask this in Thy
Name, Amen”.
“We praise Thy Name, Amen.”
“We ask this in the Name which
is above every Name, Amen”.
“Praise the Lord” – with the communal response:
“Amen”.
These above applications surely can pass for directly addressing
someone named  ‘Amen’!  It should surely be conspicuous to the alert worshipper
of the One True God of Israel!

Similar usage is also
common in Jewish worship liturgy.

Should we use it in
prayer and worship?

The position assumed
in all the Restorative Truths proclaimed by BIBLE REVELATIONS, is to avoid
extremism.  This position is also maintained in our study on the use of  ‘God or Elohim’  and the use
of the various forms of The Sacred Name.

Like with all other
considerations in the process of the Restoration of the Original True Hebraic
Faith though,  the question remains:  “What does the Almighty expect from us?”
Our intentions may be pure, but why persist in clinging to habits and traditions
which have spurious origins or connotations?  Do we really need this word to
express our convictions and praises?

It also is curious,
that this almost mystical word, anciently referred to the “hidden god” – and it
would surely not be far-fetched to surmise that perhaps Satan has managed to
hide himself as the object of worship, to unsuspecting believer to this day?

Could this realization
and avoidance of such spurious terms lead us further from the Truth or closer to
it?

Is this not after all
the purpose of true and pure worship,  that we become aware of the traits and
methods of the Deceiver and refine and purify our worship as far as is humanly
possible?  What are we defending by hedging against doubtful practices?  There
are, after all,  ‘pure’ words like “HalleluYAH”, or where necessary, the Sacred
Name itself,  which can replace this questionable praise word ‘Amen’,

Ex. 23:13:“…and make no mention of the name  of other gods,
neither let it be heard out of your mouth.”

Hosea
2:17,19
  “I (YHVH) will take the
names
of the Baals (lords) off her (His Bride’s) lips”.

 


 

Recommended additional reading
666 – Zeus and the Mark of
the Beast

God or
Elohim?

The
Sacred Name

Click here to return to:
Index of Questions  & Answers

Main Page


Join our discussion Forum for updates and discussions

of the subjects featured on the BIBLE REVELATIONS Web
Site


Click on ‘Google’
to search for your topic on this site …  


 

Click on the following Banner to Read a FREE copy of the exciting
Book

about the Ancient Biblical Prophecies
regarding the soon Coming War of Wars!

 


 

Click
here
to contact he Publishers of this Web
Site
for further information, questions or comments

 

 


 

Site Map

 

 

 

The Main Page acts as the Site
Map to BIBLE REVELATIONS’  8 Libraries arranged by Topic

 

Follow the colour
coded links on the Main Page, similar to this:

 

Click here for

 

 

 


 

 

 
//

//
// ]]>


Was Jesus Christ “Caesarion” (Son of Julius Caesar and Cleopatra)

Jesus Christ was Caesarion, the son of Julius Caesar and Cleopatra. In 46 BC Julius Caesar changed the calendar from the 13 month system to his new adapted 12 month version, using his family names as some of the months, Augustus (august) and Julius or Julie (July).

The curious thing about this is if you look closely everything pertaining to ancient Egypt is BC while everything pertaining to the Holy Roman Empire is AD. That is because the 12/13 royal bloodlines who have ruled over mankind for thousands of years have established their empires using religion and covering up history to maintain power of their empires during times of uncertainty. Therefore 45 BC is the same as 1 AD and if you look up anything that happened between 21 BC and 1 AD you will find very little information of any events. That is because during this time the Roman Empire was fully established and that is the reason for this discrepancy.

I say there are 12/13 bloodlines and the 13 is the most powerful bloodline and remains the most hidden. That is because Julius Caesar was stabbed to death by members of his own council. After this Cleopatra had her son Caesarion exiled to conceal his identity as the rightful successor to the crown and to insure hiw own safety. Caesarion was then put under the care of his adopted parent Mary and Joseph. He travelled to India and studied vedic texts under brahman priests. Returning to Alexandria Egypt later betraying his teachers and recaptured the once Egyptian Empire, now Holy Roman Empire by the name Jesus Christ. Jesus which is the name of Esau in Egyptian means, son of Isis and this is also recorded in ancient hieroglyphs. Cleopatra was the self proclaimed virgin Goddess Isis named after Isis which came before her in family succession to the crown.

Upon Jesus return he found his half sister and two other brothers. Selene was his half sister and after they were wed she had changed her name to Mary Magdalene. Or at least that is what was recorded. The truth of the matter is that none of these biblical figures other than Mary and Joseph were never accounted for historically because they were know by different names historically. Caesarion was Ptolemy the last reigning pharoah of Egypt and the founder of the HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE and the greatest lie ever told. He was also referred to as “King of Kings” and “Lord of Lords” much like his father Julius Caesar who was once worshipped as a God and established the dictatorship of Caesarion rulership

The 13 hidden bloodline I mentioned earlier is the morvingian bloodline. It includes the Queen Elizabeth and the house of Windsor, bloodline of George Bush. The remaining 12 bloodlines are known as the twelve lost tribes of Israel who have established governments today across the globe. Rendering the Bible which was mostly taken from Ancient Egypt and then adapted by Julius Caesar nothing more than a fabricated half truth edited into Julius Caesars 2000 year, three world war plan to establish a one world Government. Take a look at the book of Revelations again. They are not concerned with anyones safety but their own. Nobody gets saved but their own.

According to the Georgia Guide Stones they have planned to reduce the population dramatically. Right now it is approaching 7 Billion. What they want to maintain is a population under 500,000,000. Which means the only people to survive according to this plan for war is the 12 tribes or the 144,000. Which means by the year 2012 they plan on wiping over 6.5 billion people from the face of the earth, leaving only members and certain hand picked people as they can not only inbreed, they have to sometimes let outsiders in to maintain their bloodline.

They will use things like earthquakes often controlled by secret government organizations like HAARP and Codex Alementarius which goes in affect Globally on December 31, 2009. Codex Alementarius is a global mandate similar to how the FDA regulates food here in the US. Only codex Alementarius insures that deadly toxins and chemicals will be in our food supply come the year 2010. You may also want to check into Monsanto and his pesticide products which are killing people all around the globe today.


Queen Elizabeth Direct Decendent of King David of Israel

The tracing of the kings and queens of the Royal House of David from Old to New Testament days is an exciting and rewarding study. Though it is sometimes suggested that our Royal House is of German origin, this is not factual. The rule of the Stuarts ended unhappily and Cromwell came to power; but, tiring of his discipline, the people restored the monarchy; thus the nearest lineal descendant of the Royal House of Stuart was sought.

British "Coat-of-Arms"British “Coat-of-Arms”The daughter of James I was Elizabeth, who married the King of Bohemia. Their daughter Sophia married the Elector of Hannover and their eldest son became George I of England. Thus, the great grandson of James I became King of Great Britain and Ireland in 1714, introducing into the sovereignty of this United Kingdom, the House of Hannover and of Brunswick.

Our present Queen, Queen Elizabeth, is a direct descendant of King David of the Old Testament.

Though it might be suggested that George I was half-German, this is not so, for his father, Earnest Augustus of Hannover, and his grandfather, Frederick of Bohemia, were both descended from Odin and Frea. Odin (or Wodin) was descended from Calcol and Dardan, who were Zara-Judah’s sons. Thus the alliance of Elisabeth and Sophia only strengthened the Judah line: thus, although some members of the Royal line resided in Germany for a period. German Kings never ruled Britain at any time.

The Royal College of Heralds in Britain accepts this direct line of descent from King David to Queen Elizabeth II as factual.

God said: “I have made a covenant with my chosen, I have sworn unto David my servant, Thy seed will I establish for ever, and build up thy throne to all generations. Selah” (PSALM 89:3-4).

Also we read in JEREMIAH 33:25-26, a very definite promise: “Thus saith the LORD; If my covenant be not with day and night, and if I have not appointed the ordinances of heaven and earth; Then will I cast away the seed of Jacob, and David my servant, so that I will not take any of his seed to be rulers over the seed of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob: for I will cause their captivity to return, and have mercy on them.”

The Arbroath Declaration

The Scottish Declaration of Independence, in Latin, is written on parchment and is now kept in Register House in Edinburgh. This ancient document, described by Register House officials as “probably our most precious possession,” is dated A.D. 1320, and bears the seals of Scottish barons assembled in Parliament under Robert the Bruce.

A translation taken from the “Scots Magazine,” April, 1934, pp. 16-18, reads:

“To the Most Holy Father in Christ and Lord, the Lord John, by divine providence Supreme Pontiff of the Holy Roman and Universal Church… Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations, our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian (Mediterranean) Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous.

Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today. The Britons they first drove out, the Picts they utterly destroyed, and even though very often assailed by the Norwegians, the Danes and the English, they took possession of that home with many victories and untold efforts; and, as the historians of old time bear witness, they have held it free of all bondage ever since. In their kingdom there have reigned one hundred and thirteen kings of their own royal stock, the line unbroken by a single foreigner.

The high qualities and deserts of these people, were they not otherwise manifest, gain glory from this: that the King of kings and Lord of lords, our Lord Jesus Christ, after His Passion and Resurrection, called them, even though settled in the uttermost parts of the earth, almost the first to His most holy faith. Nor would He have them confirmed in that faith by merely anyone but by the first of His Apostles by calling – though second or third in rank – the most gentle Saint Andrew, the Blessed Peter’s brother, and desired him to keep them under his protection as their patron for ever…”

 

The Lion and Unicorn People

“How goodly are thy tents, O Jacob, and thy tabernacles, O Israel!… God brought him forth out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn: he shall eat up the nations his enemies, and shall break their bones, and pierce them through with his arrows. He couched, he lay down as a lion, and as a great lion: who shall stir him up? Blessed is he that blesseth thee, and cursed is he that curseth thee” (NUMBERS 24:5-9).

The only people represented today by the lion and unicorn together are the British people. The Royal coat of arms has on one side of the central shield a crowned lion representing a royal kingdom, and on the other side a unicorn with a chain around it representing strength.

Source: ‘Voice of Revival’


Abraham an Egyptian Pharoh

King
Abraham

by Ralph
Ellis

If I indicated that biblical Abraham was a pharaoh of
Egypt, would it appear to be an utterly absurd figment of a deranged mind?
Initially that may seem so, but this is only because we have grown so used to
the orthodox ecclesiastical creed that we have forgotten that the Biblical
Abraham was in fact a very powerful man. Josephus, the first century Jewish
historian says of Abraham:

Pharaoh Necho, king of Egypt at the time, descended on
this land with an immense army and seized Sarah the Princess, mother of our
nation. And what did our forefather Abraham do? Did he avenge the insult by
force of arms? Yet he had three hundred and eighteen officers under him, with
unlimited manpower at his disposal!

Three hundred and eighteen officers, not men, under his
command, it was obviously quite a sizable army that Abraham had at his disposal
– possibly running into the tens of thousands. In this case, the image I have
portrayed above is not quite so absurd, at the most it is just an embellishment
on what the texts say, for they do not explain from what lands and over what
peoples Abraham was such a leader. Yet how many options do we really have, how
many nations in this era would have such a powerful army? This simple
observation, holds within it the key to the fundamentals of modern theology and
these are far removed from the Christmas card images that we are so familiar
with. It is somehow explained to us by the clergy that the whole of the Western
world were suddenly transfixed by the philosophy of a family of nomadic
sheep-herders wandering around the Negev desert, a family who had held their
traditions through thousands of years – and all this at a time when most such
individuals were illiterate. This is the fantasy!

The truth is rather different and rather more believable –
Abraham, pharaoh of Egypt, master of all he surveyed, the most powerful man in
the world. Now this would be a real story to set the scribes scribbling, the
story of his sons, of his forefathers, of his mighty deeds and works. Like the
tales of all kings, each and every schoolchild would be forced to learn by rote
the names and accomplishments of the royal family, it would be ingrained into
the national psyche. This is the kind of family that can trace their history
back through 70 generations, as could Jesus, this is the kind of family that
could spawn a billion books. Jesus’ nation, the Jews, have always had an
overriding fascination with genealogy, but why should this be so? The reason is
now clear, with their aristocracy perhaps descended from a line of semi-divine
kings and descended from the mighty Egyptian empire, I think we have all the
explanations necessary. Royal dynasties to this day have the same fascination
for their family history, for the family’s entire existence depends solely on
proving their legitimacy.

Shepherds

But if the biblical family were pharaohs of Egypt, should we
not see them in the historical record? Indeed so, but first of all the precise
era to study needs to be decided and the clue to this comes from the Bible. The
patriarchs in the Bible are known as being shepherds, as I have just indicated,
in fact the Bible is quite specific about this point. Joseph’s family are asked
by pharaoh:

What is your occupation? And they said … Thy servants
are shepherds, both we, and also our fathers.

This point is not just interesting, it is fundamental to
understanding what the Bible is trying to tell us. For it just so happens that a
whole dynasty of pharaohs were known as shepherds! These were the pharaohs who,
in the historical record, had ‘invaded’ northern Egypt during the 14th to 16th
dynasties and these peoples were known as the Hyksos, a term which translates as
‘Shepherd King’. Clearly we have a very obvious and very strong link here – in
fact it is amazing that so little has been said about this coincidence. There is
a great deal of synergy here, the Bible mentions a very special family line of
Shepherds of which it says the Òkings will come out of youÓ and likewise the
historical record tells us that some of the pharaohs of northern Egypt were
called Shepherd Kings. It was a similarity that was just crying out to be
investigated and the results of this scrutiny were quite astounding.

To start this process is has to be assumed that the Bible
contains a real historical record, yet many people may look at the Bible as
something completely alien to the real world. We have the real history provided
for us by the archaeologists and then there is the theological history of the
Bible, Koran and Torah – yet it seems at times that the two records are mutually
exclusive. Nothing in the theological record really ties in with the historical
one, it is almost as if the biblical story occurred on another planet! Nothing
could be further from the truth, in reality the Bible and the historical record
continuously merge into one – if one knows how to interpret what is being
said.

The key to this entire conundrum was the term shepherd, for
why should an Egyptian pharaoh wish to be known as a shepherd? The answer lay in
the Egyptian records and their fascination with astrology, this just had to be a
stellar reference, these kings were being compared to the constellation of
Aries. With this concept firmly in the back of the mind, the Bible suddenly
started to release its long hidden secrets: for there are numerous references to
sheep and cattle in the Bible and although the subject matter fitted the quaint
pastoral image being plied by the clergy, none of them made any literal sense.
But suitably translated, with the sheep becoming the constellation of Aries (or
their followers) and the cattle as Taurus (and their followers), everything
fitted into place.

As has been alluded to in previous books, the constellations
move slowly with the millennia and each era has a ruling constellation, the
current one being Pisces. But back in the 13th 14th dynasty, they were on the
cusp of a change in the constellations, between Taurus and Aries. The era of
Taurus lasted until about 1800 BC, when Aries came into ascendance, this date is
not only very close to both the era of the first Hyksos pharaohs and the arrival
of Abraham in the Bible, but I would also suggest that this change in the
constellations caused a social rift between the Apis Bull worshippers in Thebes
(the Taureans) and the Hyksos Shepherd pharaohs in the north (the Arians). The
country was divided, there was civil war – just as the historical records
indicate.

Evidence

The Bible has direct evidence that shows this to be true and
in addition the following quote seems to be a verbatim conversation that has
been preserved for some 3,500 years. The scene is set by the 3rd century BC
Egyptian historian Manetho, who indicates (as does the Bible) that there were
actually two exoduses from Egypt – one being a major migration and the other a
much smaller exodus of priests. After the first exodus, the patriarch Joseph (he
with the coat of many colours, ie a priests stole) goes back to Egypt and rises
to become the most powerful man in Egypt, save from the pharaoh himself. Joseph
asks his family to join him in Egypt, but he has a warning for them.

(Paraphrased) You are shepherds as you know, and your
duty is to feed the cattle… And it shall come to pass that pharaoh will call
you, and shall say what is your occupation. You must say in return that your
trade has been cattle from our youth even until now, both we and also our
fathers. Otherwise you will not be allowed to stay in the land of Egypt, for we
shepherds are an abomination to the Egyptians.
Genesis
46:32

What could Joseph possibly mean by this statement? It is not
as if the Egyptians had any prohibitions on the eating of sheep meat, so why was
the pharaoh so interested in the occupation of the brothers and why was the
lowly but honourable profession of shepherd so despised? The solution is simple,
a couple of words have been altered by the scribes to give the conversation an
agricultural bias, but in truth they were discussing the most important topic in
Egypt – religion. Replacing the words with their original astrological
counterparts, the full import of the statement becomes dramatically clear.

(Paraphrased) You are Hyksos/Arians as you know, and your
duty is to convert the followers of Taurus … And it shall come to pass that
pharaoh will call you, and shall say what is your religion. You must say in
return that your religion has been Taurean from our youth even until now, both
we and also our fathers. Otherwise you will not be allowed to stay in the land
of Egypt, for we Hyksos/Arians are an abomination to the
Egyptians.

Suddenly it becomes dramatically obvious why the Egyptians
thought that shepherds were an abomination. This was not a reference to a
profession, but to a religion and an entire nation – the Hyksos. Egypt had just
been through a bitter and bloody civil war with these peoples, a war between
southern and northern Egypt which resulted in the Exodus of the Hyksos peoples
and the destruction of much of the northern delta lands. Of course the
‘shepherds’ were an abomination to the (southern) Egyptians – they were the
Hyksos Shepherds!

Suddenly the Bible makes sense, there is valid historical
data to be found if we know what to look for. Forget the picture postcard images
of simple nomadic farmers – enter the tortuous dynastic alliances and political
machinations of the most powerful people in the world in that era – the pharaohs
of Egypt. Joseph was, by the admission of the Bible, the vizier to the pharaoh,
the second most powerful man in the world. It is not a great extension of this
biblical history to say that the other members of this important family were
even more powerful, that they sat on the throne itself.

Further evidence that this is the correct interpretation to
be placed upon the Old Testament writings is provided by the later works in the
New Testament. Jesus, who was descended from the same family as the patriarchs,
was born as a Lamb of God. In other words he was a young Shepherd (Hyksos)
prince in exile, he was just a lamb for the time being. As Jesus matured to
become a Shepherd, another momentous event was happening in the skies above; at
just this precise era the constellation of Aries started to wane in the heavens
and Pisces came into the ascendance. Accordingly Jesus changed his title
according to the age-old tradition, the young shepherd became a Fisher of Men, a
king of Pisces. The first of the Grail romance “Fisher Kings” had been
crowned.

Jacoba

So if the biblical patriarchs were indeed pharaohs of Egypt,
why are they not to be found in the historical record? One of the simplest ways
of looking for evidence for this biblical pharaonic family, would be among the
all important and diligently recorded family names of the patriarchs.

Unfortunately, however, the very line of kings that we wish
to research is the most fragmentary in the historical record, but nevertheless,
some progress can be made. As a starting point in this search, take a look at an
encyclopaedia of the pharaohs of Egypt and flick through the pages until you
reach the sixteenth dynasty, the period that covers the last of the Hyksos
pharaohs. The last pharaoh listed is Yacobaam, a name not unrelated to that of
the patriarch Jacob. Many deliberations on this similarity are made within the
book “Jesus Last of the Pharaohs”, including the removal of the ‘m’ at the end
of the name, which is likely to be a ‘determinative’ glyph. The resulting
conclusion has to be that there is a direct connection here.


Fig 1 The
cartouche for Yacobaam

Suddenly the Biblical Jacob, father of Joseph, becomes the
historical Jacoba, a Hyksos Egyptian pharaoh. This is a revolution in theology,
but it is only a small step in a long process of uncovering the truth. The
Biblical family is about to be transformed in terms of its political and secular
importance. We have found the first bunch of grapes on this ancient royal
vine.

This is the radical theory that underpins the whole of the book
“Jesus, Last of the Pharaohs”. It is a real story, constantly backed up by the
ancient text themselves. The first step towards this transformation is to
readjust our perceptions of the past. Throw out the years of established dogma
that clouds our normally rational and critical analysis of the world and look at
history anew. See the incredible tale of a ruling dynasty that has managed to
cling to the greasy pole of history, despite the millennia of misunderstandings
and persecutions, a family that is not even recognised by the faithful that
worship them to this day. The Torah and Old Testament were never intended to be
simple tales of Asiatic tribes and sheep herders. The true story is a complete
history of the ruling family of Egypt, the ‘Royal Bloodline’. It is a history
that can both solve the mysteries of man’s dim and distant past and also tell us
something of our future destiny.

Bloodline

Working through the Bible looking for pharaohs was an interesting
task, but although this may seem to be a bizarre field of study, nevertheless
coincidences seemed to fall out of the texts like confetti. Each of the names in
the table below has only required small changes to the pharaonic names, each
made using the standard techniques that all Egyptologists use, to reform
themselves into their Biblical equivalents. This is not ‘cheating’, for
Egyptologists do not know themselves how these names are supposed to be
pronounced. Should the name Stephen, for instance, be pronounced Steven or
Step-hen? Without a guide it is impossible to know. Now we have our guide, the
Torah, Bible and Koran will instruct us as to how these ancient names should be
pronounced. Using this simple technique of name comparison, suddenly the texts
come alive with historical kings:

After a long list of biblical pharaohs we finally come to another
pharaoh, the one mentioned by the historian Josephus at the beginning of the
article – Necho. Looking down the historical record for an equivalent pharaoh
reveals that the closest match is Nehesy, a fifteenth dynasty pharaoh. This link
may not seem totally convincing at this stage, but remember that Egyptologists
are uncertain of the exact pronunciation here so the name Nehesy could also be
seen as being pronounced as Nehosy, each is a valid transliteration. It is also
significant that the name of Abraham’s wife was Sarah, which is quite possibly a
derivation of this same pharaoh’s throne name, which was Aasehra.

Abraham

So perhaps Necho and Nehesy were simply different renditions of
the ‘first name’ of this pharaoh. Looking at the Bible we find a possible third
translation of this name, that of Nachor, the grand-father of Abraham. Have we
found another Biblical pharaoh? The Biblical Nachor and Josephus’ pharaoh called
Necho seem far too close for comfort. To find out for sure we could always
compare the family histories involved, comparing the sons and grand-sons for
instance. The son of the Biblical Nachor was Thara, whereas the son of the
pharaoh Nehesy was Sheshi. Thus far, this is not looking too promising.

But wait just a minute, the throne-name of the pharaoh Nehesy is
Aasahra and this seems to equate very nicely with the Biblical Thara; it looks
as if the Bible has simply dropped the initial ‘A’ in the name. The fact that
there was an original ‘A’ attached to this Biblical name is confirmed by the
same stories that occur in the Koran, where the same individual (the father of
Abraham) is called Azar. The Koran, however, seems to have lost the ‘a’ at the
end of the name, it has lost the suffix of this name instead of the prefix. but
if we conjoin the two patriarchal names of Azar and Thara, we either derive the
name Aathara or Azara. All in all, it would appear that the pharaonic name of
Aasahra has been preserved rather well over the years in these religious
texts.

What we now have is the father and grand-father of Abraham being
joined into just one individual in the Egyptian historical record, where he is
listed under the two names of the pharaoh Nehesy. If we quite legitimately
change the second vowel in the name Nehesy to an ‘o’, we thus derive:

The historical Pharaoh: Nehosy (Aasahra)
The Biblical
Patriarch: Nachor (Azarah)

This is a very satisfying arrangement. However the whole edifice
we have just built up, seems to fall down on the count of one glaring error –
the son of Nehesy. The Biblical Nachor (Azarah) fathered Abraham himself. Yet if
we look at the historical record, the son of Nehesy (Aasarah) is this pharaoh
called Sheshi, this is truly unsatisfactory and it seems to undermine all the
progress that has been made so far.

Actually this is not so, it was just the result that was needed to
finally convince me, and perhaps the reader, that this was not all wishful
thinking, that this line of Biblical pharaohs is a historical reality. Why?
Because the throne name of the pharaoh Sheshi is none other than Mayebre or
Mamayebra. This name not only sounds like Abraham, with the ‘M’ displaced to the
end, it is quite possibly another very simple and possibly deliberate
mistranslation of it. The cartouche of Mamayebra looks like this:


Fig 2.
Cartouche of Mayebra
Mam-aye-bra ~ Ay-bra-ham.

What better way to hide the name of a pharaoh, than simply moving
the first syllable to the end of the name. So subtle and yet so effective was
the ploy, that the truth lay hidden for thousands of years – Abraham was a
pharaoh of Egypt. The Bible seems to admit this possibility, even if theologians
will not; of Abraham it says:

For a father of many nations I have made thee. And I shall
make thee exceedingly fruitful … and kings shall come out of
thee.

The true royal status of Abraham can be seen once more, it is just
as the biblical texts tell us, “… and kings shall come out of thee.” Now the
ma’at, the truth, can be told; the Biblical patriarchs were indeed powerful
people, they were pharaohs of Egypt.

Jesus

This line of Biblical pharaohs is the baton that “Jesus, Last of
the Pharaohs” takes up and runs with. Here we have the outline for an entirely
new history of Egypt and Palestine. The great Exodus can be seen in an entirely
new light, with the causes and ramifications of this historic event falling on
the shoulders of Egypt herself, it was nothing more or less than an internal
dispute – a civil war. Jesus too, sprang from this royal vine, he too was a
pharaoh of Egypt, but a pharaoh in exile. Egypt was no longer seen as being
their rightful property by the royal dynasty at this time, but the traditions
and influences of Egypt were still strong enough that the young Jesus was sent
there to receive his education; they were also strong enough for the ‘lamb’ to
pronounce himself a Fisher of Men – the ancient traditions were still being
adhered to. We continue to follow the ministry of Jesus and find many references
to his royal stature, plus some ‘new’, very interesting and contemporary
historical references that place Jesus in a real historical context. He was
described by his detractors in that era as being the ‘Egyptian False Prophet’,
he was also the governor of Tiberias and he later tried to take Jerusalem back
from the rebel Jewish factions by force of arms with 600 men from his base on
the Mount of Olives, an event that is described in the Bible in dramatically
similar phrases.

The book “Jesus, Last of the Pharaohs” runs with this theme
through thick and thin, for the results of this new theological interpretation
can sometimes be both shocking and profound. But this is not an idea born in a
vacuum, every step of the way the ancient texts assure us that this was the true
history – one just needs to know the key to unlock these long forgotten secrets
and the will to embrace them.

Lastly we need to address the ramifications of this research, for
they are many. For, to the orthodox believer of the three Judaic religions this
whole concept may appear to be a heresy to be mocked and derided, but I hope
there are many readers out there with more open minds. The Jewish and Christian
hierarchy have delivered a simple creed to us, but it is one that is not fully
supported by the texts. They have taught us a tale of simple shepherds, but the
texts say again and again, from Abraham to Jesus, that these people were kings.
All I have done is to take the texts at their word and built a story on those
foundations. To understand this new creed does demand a readjustment to ones
religious outlook, but it is not as big an adjustment as one might expect. The
trade here, for Christians in particular, is one that dissolves the unique
divinity of Jesus but it delivers in return a Christian history that is
traceable back to the very start of the historical world, back into pre-dynastic
Egypt and beyond. It means that the family of Jesus and their descendants, can
trace their history through every Egyptian pharaoh, the longest recorded family
history in the world. Personally, I find such concepts both fascinating and
tantalising, it detracts nothing from the religious world to think that Jesus
was, perhaps, the Last of the Pharaohs.

© 1998, 1999 by R.
Ellis

R. Ellis has asserted his rights, in
accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identified as
the author of this work.

All rights reserved. Without limiting the
rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any
means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without
the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher. Any
person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be
liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages.

Website designed by Artifice Design


Vatican Ownes Great Britain ?

The ‘Crown’ that owns Virginia (USA) is the administrative corporation of the City of London, an State independent of Great Britain and wholly owned by the Pontiff of Rome. Since 1213, the Monarchs of England have been puppet Monarchs under the Pontifex Maximus of the Holy Roman Empire, a corporate body over which the pontiff of Rome is CEO. Since 1300, when the Crown of Great Britain (England) was made a sub-corporation of the Crown of the City of London, the
Monarchs of England, as CEO of the Crown of Great Britain have been agents for the Crown of the City. Thus, the real Crown was obfuscated from the eyes of the ‘colonials’. But, anyone who cared to look and reason could have seen this
scheme even in the late AD 1700s.

The ‘common law’ of England, since the incorporation of the British Crown around AD 1300, has been Roman Municipal Law, a type of Roman civil law designed to rule over debtor States. The Anglo-Saxon common law, which used only ‘God’s Law’,
ceased to exist with the implementation of the feudal system where all people were subjects of the corporate Crown, and after the Pope’s Papal Bull, Unam Sanctam 1302 where he declared: “Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff.” Subject means slave, as does ‘citizen’ and ‘freeman’.

Roman Law uses the law of the sea because all human institutions in the Roman system are make-believe ships at sea (incorporated bodies).

The ‘all caps’ spelling does not make the ‘legal identity name” (strawman). It is where the family name has been converted into a ‘surname – primary name’. The all caps only signifies that the name carries with its use the status of
slave pledged as chattel in bankruptcy of the State.